ArticleAcute and critical care2025
Deep learning-based model for detection of intracranial waveforms with poor brain compliance in southern Thailand.
Article in Acute and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntracranial pressure (ICP) waveform analysis provides critical insights into brain compliance and can aid in the early detection of neurological deterioration. Deep learning (DL) has recently emerged as an effective approach for analyzing complex medical signals and imaging data. The aim of the present research was to develop a DL-based model for detecting ICP waveforms indicative of poor brain compliance.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using ICP wave images collected from postoperative hydrocephalus (HCP) patients who underwent ventriculostomy. The images were categorized into normal and poor compliance waveforms. Precision, recall, mean average precision at the 0.5 intersection over union (mAP_0.5), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to test.
resultsThe dataset consisted of 2,744 ICP wave images from 21 HCP patients. The best-performing model achieved a precision of 0.97, a recall of 0.96, and a mAP_0.5 of 0.989. The confusion matrix for poor brain compliance waveform detection using the test dataset also demonstrated a high classification accuracy, with true positive and true negative rates of 48.5% and 47.8%, respectively. Additionally, the model demonstrated high accuracy, achieving a mAP_0.5 of 0.994, sensitivity of 0.956, specificity of 0.970, and an AUC of 0.96 in the detection of poor compliance waveforms.
conclusionsThe DL-based model successfully detected pathological ICP waveforms, thereby enhancing clinical decision-making. As DL advances, its significance in neurocritical care will help to pave the way for more individualized and data-driven approaches to brain monitoring and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.