ArticleAcute and critical care2025
Prognostic value of novel indices combining Shock Index, Reverse Shock Index, age, and oxygen saturation for predicting mortality in COVID-19 patients in Iran at emergency department triage: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Acute and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of the study was to investigate the role of the Shock Index (SI), the Reverse Shock Index (RSI) along with oxygen saturation in predicting mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at an academic hospital over a period of 6 months and involved patients over the age of 18 who had been diagnosed with COVID-19 via positive polymerase chain reaction tests. The data were recorded anonymously using a checklist. The study focused on indices such as the SI and RSI, both alone and in conjunction with age and oxygen saturation, to predict hospital mortality. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software.
resultsThe study involved 500 COVID-19 patients with a 14.4% mortality rate. Key differences were found between survival and mortality groups in terms of age, vital signs except diastolic blood pressure, length of stay, and a series of laboratory tests. Logistic regression showed gender, oxygen saturation, hemoglobin, direct bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer, and Age SI/oxygen saturation (SpO2) and RSI×SpO2/Age indices significantly associated with hospital mortality. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated Age SI/SpO2 and RSI×SpO2/Age as effective mortality predictors, exhibiting an area under the curve of 0.80 and achieving a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of over 70%.
conclusionsThe combination of SI, the RSI along with hypoxia, and age has been identified as a potentially more significant role in ruling out hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients than vital signs alone, given the established role of hypoxia as a major risk factor in such cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.