Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40903343›Full record

Trial reportNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2025

A double-blind, controlled trial of circadian effective light therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Bradley T Wyman, Dan Adams, Suzanne Hendrix, Jeffrey Groves, Wayne Croft, Noel Ellison, C Warren Olanow, Karl Kieburtz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02175472 (Sixty Minute Exposure of Specific Bandwidth Light for the Treatment of Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02175472 nacompletednot on this map

Sixty Minute Exposure of Specific Bandwidth Light for the Treatment of Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhotoPharmics, Inc.Ran2014 to 2016Enrolled92ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsSpectramax light therapy device, Control light device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bradley T WymanOThree Consulting LLC, 1759 E Longbranch Ct, Draper, UT, 84020, USA. Electronic address: bwyman@thebrackengroup.com.
Dan AdamsPhotoPharmics, Inc., 3451 Triumph Blvd, Suite 201, Lehi, UT, 84043, USA.
Suzanne HendrixPentara Corporation, 2261 E 3300 S, Millcreek, UT 84109, USA.
Jeffrey GrovesAspen Clinical Research LLC, 1215 S 1680 W, Orem, UT 84058, USA.
Wayne CroftAspen Clinical Research LLC, 1215 S 1680 W, Orem, UT 84058, USA.
Noel EllisonPentara Corporation, 2261 E 3300 S, Millcreek, UT 84109, USA.
C Warren OlanowDepartment of Neurology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Karl KieburtzClintrex, 2 North Tamiami Trail, Suite 308 Sarasota, Florida 34236, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite current medical therapy for Parkinson's Disease (PD), many experience persistent motor symptoms and significant unmanaged non-motor issues. Previous studies suggest that light therapy (LT) provides benefits for motor and non-motor features of PD. This study evaluated Circadian Effective LT (CELT) with a spectral band between 460 and 545 ​nm for the motor and non-motor features of PD. We conducted a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial of CELT in people with Parkinson's disease on standard-of-care therapy. Ninety-two participants (45 active, 47 control) were randomized 1:1 to active or control CELT for 1 ​h each evening for 6 months. Patients were evaluated in their 'ON state'. The mean (SE) change on the primary endpoint of the MDS-UPDRS parts 1-3 was -17.7(2.8) active vs -9.7(3.5) control, for a LSM difference of -8.0 (4.4) (p ​= ​0.074, 95% Confidence Interval: -16.7, 0.8), reflecting a trend toward improvement over control. Key secondary endpoints included PDQ-39 and CGI which favored active treatment (-5.7 ​± ​2.7; p ​= ​0.038, and -0.4 ​± ​0.2; p ​= ​0.066 respectively), while PDSS-2 Disturbed Sleep showed no difference between groups. Other secondary endpoints that supported the overall treatment effect of CELT included ESS (-1.52 ​± ​0.78; p ​= ​0.054) and CGI-E (-0.3 ​± ​0.2; p ​= ​0.088). Daily LT, with a circadian effective targeted spectrum of light, was well tolerated by PD patients, had no serious adverse effects and showed improvement in both motor and non-motor MDS-UPDRS and other scores. Larger double-blind studies are warranted to further assess the effectiveness of CELT in PD. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02175472.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmParkinson DiseasePhototherapyAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeLight therapyMotorNon-motorParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID40903343
PMCPMC12664443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.