ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2025
Examination of artificial oocyst excystation methods in the murine coccidium, Eimeria krijgsmanni.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eimeria spp. cause coccidiosis characterized by diarrhea and induce serious economic losses in livestock industries. Although several anti-coccidial drugs are currently available, the emergence of resistant strains and drug residues is problematic; therefore, the development of new drugs is needed. Since sporozoites of Eimeria spp. invade host intestinal epithelial cells and numerous merozoites are formed, drugs that target sporozoites are expected to be useful. We previously used murine Eimeria krijgsmanni as a model to examine anti-coccidial drug susceptibility; however, few studies have conducted drug evaluations against sporozoites. The establishment of excystation protocols is essential for progress in in vitro experiments using sporozoites because oocysts must be isolated from feces using complex techniques before the excystation process. Various artificial excystation protocols have been reported for each Eimeria spp.; however, those for E. krijgsmanni have not yet been examined. Therefore, 4 protocols described in previous studies were herein conducted for E. krijgsmanni. Pepsin was important for excystation in rodent Eimeria spp., and this was also the case for E. krijgsmanni. Excystation rates were higher with the physical disruption of oocyst walls than with pepsin. An incubation in HBSS containing 0.25% (w/v) trypsin and 0.1% (w/v) sodium taurocholate after a physical treatment achieved higher and the most stable excystation rates. Modifications to this method were also examined, and no improvements were observed. The optimal excystation protocol for E. krijgsmanni was elucidated as of now.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.