ArticleEndocrine journal2025
Real-world clinical experience of reduced-dose initiation of lenvatinib in Japanese patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer.
Article in Endocrine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a sensitive plasma lenvatinib quantification method and validation in thyroid cancer patients.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Real-world experience of clinicopathological features and survival predictors in radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer treated with multi-kinase inhibitors: a multicentre study from southeastern Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lenvatinib is approved for the first-line treatment for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) at a starting dose of 24 mg/day, but its high toxicity often necessitates dose reductions and interruptions. To clarify the efficacy and safety of the reduced dose-initiation of lenvatinib, especially for smaller-build and/or frail Asians, we retrospectively examined outcomes of 43 Japanese individuals with RR-DTC who were treated with lenvatinib, focusing on the initial dose. Twenty-three patients initiated lenvatinib at a full-dose (24 mg/day) and 20 patients initiated at a reduced-dose (≤14 mg/day). In the full dose-initiation group, 14 of 23 (60.8%) patients required discontinuation of lenvatinib within ~30 days due to adverse effects, which was significantly higher rate compared to that (25.0%) of the reduced dose-initiation group (p = 0.018), and 5 patients of the full dose-initiation group did not resume treatment. Compared to the full dose-initiation group, the reduced dose-initiation group were older (nonsignificant) and had significantly lower body weights, lower overall daily dose exposure, and a lower frequency of adverse events (≥grade 2) but a comparable dose interruption rate and daily dose exposure per kg during overall observation period. In multivariate analyses for progression-free survival and overall survival, malignant pleural effusion and symptomatic metastases but not the starting dose of lenvatinib were significantly associated with worse outcomes. Initiating lenvatinib at a reduced dose based on patients' physical status may be an option, with not only lower adverse events but also efficacy comparable to that of the full dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.