ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2026
The Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab after Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez+Bev) as a 2nd line therapy after the administration of durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur+Tre) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. We focused on the treatment outcomes and adverse event profiles specific to this sequential regimen. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 16 patients who received 2nd line Atez+Bev after Dur+Tre therapy between April 2023 and August 2024 in our hospital and associated institutions. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), treatment duration, and adverse events were assessed. Results The ORR and DCR for 2nd line Atez+Bev were 25.0% and 75.0%, respectively, thus suggesting favorable disease control. Even among patients who were non-responsive to Dur+Tre, two achieved a tumor response and eight achieved disease control. Regarding safety, pruritus was a common adverse event for both regimens. Colitis and diarrhea were more frequent in the Dur+Tre group, whereas proteinuria, hyperammonemia, and bleeding were more common in the Atez+Bev group. Conclusion This study suggests that Atez+Bev remains a viable option for patients unresponsive to Dur+Tre. Prior Dur+Tre therapy may enhance the immune response within the tumor microenvironment, thereby augmenting the efficacy of Atez+Bev. However, it is important to pay attention to the differences in adverse effect profiles between the two regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.