ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with a Positive Finding for the Coronary Spasm Provocation Test at Low Acetylcholine Doses.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test is an invasive standard for diagnosing coronary spastic angina (CSA)/vasospastic angina. Although the guidelines recommend incremental doses of ACh, the clinical relevance of the significant response to lower ACh doses is unclear. Methods From April 2012 to June 2024, 636 patients with no significant epicardial coronary disease undergoing intracoronary ACh provocation testing for the diagnosis of CSA were included. Patients with positive ACh test results were divided into two groups: the low-dose positive group, defined as those who tested positive at the initial dose of ACh in the left and/or right coronary arteries without further dose escalation, and the high-dose positive group, including those who required higher doses for a positive result. The occurrence of intraprocedural adverse events and long-term outcomes was also evaluated. Results Of the 636 patients, 306 (48.1%) were classified as negative, 304 (47.8%) as high-dose positive, and 26 (4.1%) as low-dose positive based on the ACh provocation tests. The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the high- and low-dose positive groups. ST-segment elevation on electrocardiography during ACh tests and unstable angina during the follow-up period were more frequent in the low-dose positive group than in the high-dose positive group, while the overall clinical outcomes were similar among the groups. Conclusion Among patients with CSA diagnosed using ACh provocation testing, nearly 10% had a positive diagnosis at a low dose. There may be distinct underlying mechanisms and clinical outcomes depending on the ACh dose required for a positive test result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.