ArticleWorld journal of surgery2025
Nationwide Analysis of Failure to Rescue After Liver Transplantation.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Nationwide Analysis of Failure to Rescue After Liver Transplantation.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFailure to rescue (FTR) is mortality after a major complication. FTR may be an effective quality metric in liver transplantation (LT). However, there is a paucity of nationwide data on the rates and effects of FTR on outcomes. Our study aims to determine the nationwide rate of FTR and its impact on outcomes after LT.
methodsWe analyzed the 2015-2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database, including all patients with LT. Patients were stratified into terciles of average center mortality of < 1% for low (L), 1%-5.76% for intermediate (I), and > 5.76% for high (H). Postoperative complications were identified. Primary outcomes were the rate of FTR and the predictors of FTR. Multivariable regression analysis was performed.
resultsA total of 12,134 patients with LT were identified at 82 centers. The sample was stratified into L: 1770 (14.6%), I: 5914 (48.7%), and H: 4450 (36.7%). The mean age was 52.2 ± 16.6 years, and 63.1% were male. Of these, 99.7% underwent deceased-donor LT, most commonly due to alcoholic cirrhosis (31.9%), followed by metabolic steatohepatitis (20.7%). The rate of FTR was 5%, with the most common complication being renal failure at 60.6%, followed by respiratory failure at 43.1%. FTR rate differences were significant (H: 8.8% vs. I: 3.6% vs. L: 1.3%; p < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated an independent association between FTR and H (odds ratio [OR] 1.79 [1.52-1.89]). The predictors of FTR were both patient- and center-related: low-income quartile (OR 1.23 [1.11-1.39]), malnutrition (OR 1.22 [1.09-1.29]), presenting diagnosis of biliary atresia (OR 3.39 [1.95-5.93]), presenting diagnosis of acute liver failure (OR 5.01 [4.09-6.15]), Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] (OR 1.24 [1.18-1.31]), frailty (OR 1.58 [1.46-1.73]), LT at a low-volume center (< 20 cases/year) (OR 1.83 [1.78-2.01]), and readmission to a different hospital (OR 2.08 [1.78-2.11]). Protective factors were LT at a metropolitan teaching hospital (OR 0.96 [0.87-0.99]), presenting a diagnosis of primary hepatic malignancy (OR 0.66 [0.52-0.86]), high-income quartile (OR 0.74 [0.57-0.96]), disposition to rehab (OR 0.09 [0.03-0.26]), and high-volume centers (> 50 cases/year) (OR 0.32 [0.20-0.49]).
conclusionsFTR remains a critical issue in LT, with significant variability across centers. These findings demonstrate associations, not causation, between center- and patient-level factors and FTR rates. Identifying and addressing modifiable predictors of FTR presents opportunities for improving perioperative management and postoperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.