Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40903087›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Longitudinal investigation of psychological outcomes associated with screen use in Danish preschool children: study protocol for The Digital Child.

Mette Nygaard, Mille Faurhøj Olsen, Melissa M W Thomsen, Nur Hazwani Abd Hadi, Katrine Lynggaard Trans, Sharon Horwood, Trine Flensborg-Madsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mette NygaardNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8896-4781
Mille Faurhøj OlsenNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Melissa M W ThomsenNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nur Hazwani Abd HadiSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Katrine Lynggaard TransNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2744-0458
Sharon HorwoodSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Trine Flensborg-MadsenNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark tfl@sdu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6753-335X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite an increasing use of screens among preschool children and evidence suggesting potential adverse effects, there is a paucity of longitudinal research that aims to disentangle the multifaceted components of screen use and their unique associations with development. We present a protocol for a large-scale national longitudinal study with repeated measurements in Danish preschool children, with the aim of investigating the cross-sectional and cross-lagged longitudinal associations between screen use and psychological outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Digital Child Study is a national prospective observational cohort of Danish preschool children. Baseline parent-report data collection commenced in 2024 via online questionnaires, and in total will include three time points over 1 year: baseline (age 4 years), and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months (ages 4.5 and 5 years). Participants were divided into two waves based on birth dates, starting in March and September 2024. Recruitment targeted parents and primary caregivers of all Danish children born between specific dates in 2020. Of 30 235 children whose parents were sent invitations, baseline questionnaire data were available for 11 690 (39%).Children's screen use was measured by detailed information of amount, content and timing of children's screen use, and the broader context, incorporating parental mediation strategies, attitudes, motivations and practices. Cognitive and socioemotional developmental outcomes were measured using validated tools such as the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, the Nordic Five-to-Fifteen parent questionnaire and the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool Version. Questionnaire data will be linked to national social and health registries to enable long-term follow-up. Statistical analyses will include longitudinal modelling to explore associations between screen use and developmental outcomes, with sensitivity analyses for robustness. The study's large sample size provides high statistical power to detect meaningful effects. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study adheres to ethical research guidelines, ensuring voluntary participation, confidentiality and compliance with data protection laws, with approvals from relevant authorities. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and plain-language summaries to engage stakeholders and the broader community.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorChild DevelopmentScreen TimeChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleParentsProspective StudiesResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesChildCognitionObservational StudyPUBLIC HEALTHSocial InteractionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40903087
PMCPMC12410681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.