ArticleBMJ open2025
Effect of health promotion interventions in supermarkets on dietary variety among Japanese older adults: a protocol for a cluster non-randomised parallel-group comparative trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWith an ageing population, prevention of frailty among older adults has become a critical public health issue. Dietary habits are one of the essential components in frailty prevention, which involves promoting changes in dietary behaviours, such as including dietary variety. However, community-level health promotion interventions face significant challenges, including limited spatial access to food, which is important as it is not easy to change the behaviour of older adults. The dissemination of community-level health promotion interventions targeting dietary behavioural changes among older adults remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of supermarket-based health promotion interventions on dietary variety among older Japanese adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a cluster non-randomised parallel-group comparative trial involving 15 supermarkets in the Yamanashi and Nagano Prefectures, Japan. Seven supermarkets will be assigned to the intervention group and eight to the control group. The intervention group will receive a health promotion programme consisting of three components to enhance dietary diversity: information, education and support delivery. The intervention design incorporates social marketing strategies, and programme evaluation will be conducted concurrently. Data, including the Dietary Variety Score (DVS) for the primary outcome, will be collected through postal and electronic surveys at baseline and at 1, 2 and 3 years, with the 3-year follow-up serving as the primary endpoint for effectiveness evaluation. Statistical analyses will use a generalised linear mixed model, focusing on changes in the DVS as the primary outcome. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses will be performed to assess the generalisability of the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology Research Ethics Committee has approved the research protocol (approval number: R23-116). The results will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed international journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000056023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.