Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40902999›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Evolutionary Constraints Guide AlphaFold2 in Predicting Alternative Conformations and Inform Rational Mutation Design.

Valerio Piomponi, Alberto Cazzaniga, Francesca Cuturello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valerio PiomponiResearch and Technology Institute, Area Science Park, località Padriciano, 99, 34149 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0433-8319
Alberto CazzanigaResearch and Technology Institute, Area Science Park, località Padriciano, 99, 34149 Trieste, Italy.
Francesca CuturelloResearch and Technology Institute, Area Science Park, località Padriciano, 99, 34149 Trieste, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating structural variability is essential for understanding protein biological functions. Although AlphaFold2 accurately predicts static structures, it fails to capture the full spectrum of functional states. Recent methods have used AlphaFold2 to generate diverse structural ensembles, but they offer limited interpretability and overlook the evolutionary signals underlying the predictions. In this work, we enhance the generation of conformational ensembles and identify sequence patterns that influence the alternative fold predictions for several protein families. Building on prior research that clustered multiple sequence alignments to predict fold-switching states, we introduce a refined clustering strategy that integrates protein language model representations with hierarchical clustering, overcoming limitations of density-based methods. Our strategy effectively identifies high-confidence alternative conformations and generates abundant sequence ensembles, providing a robust framework for applying direct coupling analysis (DCA). Through DCA, we uncover key coevolutionary signals within the clustered alignments, leveraging them to design mutations that stabilize specific conformations, which we validate using alchemical free energy calculations from molecular dynamics. Notably, our method extends beyond fold-switching, effectively capturing a variety of conformational changes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMutationProteinsMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationProtein FoldingThermodynamicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID40902999
PMCPMC12458692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.