ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2025
Analytical and Clinical Evaluation of the AltoStar Adenovirus PCR Kit 1.5 and the AltoStar Automation System AM16 for Adenovirus Detection in Plasma and Stool Samples.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human adenoviruses (HAdVs) can result in significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. The AltoStar Adenovirus PCR Kit 1.5 (AltoStar HAdV PCR) is a real-time PCR test for the detection and quantification of HAdV DNA. In this study, the performance of the AltoStar HAdV PCR was evaluated compared with a laboratory-developed HAdV PCR based on MultiCode HAdV reagents (MultiCode HAdV PCR) using plasma and stool specimens. Performance of the AltoStar HAdV PCR was established by determining the linearity, lower limit of detection, precision, specificity, accuracy, and inclusivity of the assay. Accuracy was determined by testing plasma and stool clinical samples previously tested by the MultiCode HAdV PCR and inclusivity evaluated by using several HAdV genotypes. A time-and-motion study was performed to compare the workflows of both PCRs. The limit of detection was <200 copies/mL for both sample types. Overall agreement with the MultiCode HAdV PCR was 91% for plasma samples and 85.5% for stool samples. Quantitative agreement between the two tests was moderate. Specificity and precision in both sample types were high. All major HAdV species tested were detected. Hands-on-time was significantly less for the semi-automated AltoStar HAdV PCR. The AltoStar HAdV PCR showed great performance for the detection and/or quantitation of HAdV in clinical samples.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.