ArticleJournal of radiation research2025
Assessing cancer risk due to exposure to radionuclides in soil dust in mining areas of South Africa.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the environmental significance of airborne particulates generated from mine tailings, there is limited information on exposure of people living in the neighbourhoods adjacent to such sites. The main objective of the study was to assess cancer risk due to enhanced radionuclides present in dust samples and to evaluate the exposure risk of populations living in three mining areas in the Free State and West Rand in South Africa. Soil and dust samples were collected between January 2016 and March 2018 in different seasons for determination of the level of naturally occurring radioactive materials in the samples. The samples were prepared and sealed for 4 weeks to attain secular equilibrium of the 238U and 232Th and their respective progenies, and thereafter analysed using gamma spectroscopy. Radiological parameters were calculated from the activity of the radionuclides to estimate exposure risk. The absorbed dose rate in air ranged from 76 to 137, 50 to 133 and 19 to 75 (nGy hr-1) for areas A, B and C, respectively. The mean excess lifetime cancer risk in all three mines was lower than the world average of 1.45 × 10-3; accordingly, the cancer risk was found to be negligible. The findings revealed that most radiological parameters were within the accepted international values; thus the soils in the areas could be considered to be safe for the humans living there.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.