ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2025
Strain-based biomarkers at the skin surface differentiate asymmetries in soft tissue mobility associated with myofascial pain.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detecting Intervention-Specific Change in Soft Tissue Mobility Aligned with Regional Pain Through Optically Measured Skin Surface Strains.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Technologies to investigate the mechanisms of force-based manipulations: a narrative methods review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Strain-based biomarkers at the skin surface detect changes in soft tissue mobility linked to myofascial pain following soft tissue manipulation intervention.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soft tissue manipulation is used widely to assess myofascial tissue qualitatively but lacks objective measures. To quantify the mobility of myofascial tissue, this effort derives optical biomarkers from the skin surface, as observed in the hands-on workflow of clinicians. Digital image correlation using three high-resolution cameras captures the cervicothoracic region as a clinician deeply engages and stretches the skin and myofascial tissue. Nineteen participants were positioned prone and marked with semi-permanent tattoos, optimized for tracking tissue without compromising its natural mechanics. Tissue mobility was then clinically assessed both bilaterally (left and right sides of body) and directionally (superior and inferior directions of pull). Eleven strain-based biomarkers were derived per tissue pull. With participants' data aggregated, the sides of the body were indistinct, though pull in the superior direction was distinct from that in the inferior direction. Given substantial variance in the biomarkers' absolute values between participants, we then evaluated each person individually. Therein, distinct tissue behaviors were observed. In particular, bilateral differences were identified in nine participants, eight of whom reported discrepancies in pain between their left and right sides, while directional distinctions were observed in sixteen participants, as expected given similar anatomical tissue structures between individuals. In our sample of participants, optical skin surface tracking and derived strain-based biomarkers identified asymmetrical distinctions in bilateral mobility, which correspond with self-reported pain. Such objective assessment of myofascial tissue stiffness is important in monitoring and treating chronic musculoskeletal pain, which afflicts half of the U.S. adult population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.