ArticleJMIR medical education2025
Assessing and Improving Study Skills Support in Medical Education Through a Student-Staff Partnership: Mixed Methods Approach.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The necessity for self-regulated, lifelong learners in the rapidly evolving field of medicine underscores the importance of effective study skills. Efforts to support students with these skills have had positive outcomes but are often limited in scope and accessibility, with a tendency to target groups facing immediate challenges. Objective: This study aimed to explore the student perspective on study skills support at University College London Medical School through a student-staff partnership, with the goal of guiding future improvements. Methods: A mixed methods approach was adopted using an anonymous questionnaire and focus groups. After analyzing questionnaire responses using descriptive statistics to refine focus group questions, focus groups were conducted to delve deeper into identified issues. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using inductive coding. Results: In total, 116 students completed the questionnaire in full and 6 students participated in 2 focus groups. The questionnaire revealed that 68% (68/100) of respondents felt that they never received study skills support at University College London Medical School. Preferred methods of support included small group sessions (56/100, 56%) and topics like examination preparation (83/100, 83%) and study skills specific to medicine (72/100, 72%). Focus group themes were the lack of current study skills support, delivery of study skills support, specific study skills for medical school, personalized approach to support needed, and accessing support. Findings informed the co-creation of study skills resources. Conclusions: Overall, the findings highlight the need for strategically incorporating study skills support at medical school, emphasizing early and consistent promotion and tailored delivery methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.