ArticleJMIR human factors2025
Smartphone Apps and Wearables for Health Parameters in Young Adulthood: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mobile Apps to Improve Health Parameters in Healthy Adults: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Pooled it
- Telemedicine in pediatrics: a critical narrative review of innovations, limitations, and future priorities.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Young adults' perceptions and experiences in using mobile apps and wearables for health: a qualitative study with public involvement.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Crafting the ideal multidimensional active ageing intervention with wearables for older adults: insights from a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- A theory-driven user-centered design framework for wellness applications targeting young adults: The MiCARE methodology.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fostering innovative and more effective interventions to support active aging strategies from youth is crucial to help this population adopt healthier lifestyles using technologies they are already familiar with. Mobile health (mHealth), particularly apps and wearables, represents a promising approach due to its versatility, ease of use, and ability to monitor multiple health variables simultaneously. Moreover, these devices offer opportunities for personalization and support in health behavior change, making them valuable tools for shaping healthy habits from a young age. Objective: This study aims to (1) investigate whether young adults (18-26 years old) use apps or wearables to monitor or improve their health variables (ie, physical activity, diet, and mental health); (2) examine how they use them; (3) identify the most commonly used apps and wearables and the most frequently monitored health variables across these domains; and (4) evaluate the importance of different characteristics and functions of apps and wearables for health purposes. Methods: This cross-sectional study used a public involvement framework to enhance the research quality and was conducted through an anonymous web survey disseminated across Italy over a 3-month period. The survey consisted of 5 sections: (1) demographics, (2) mobile apps and wearable devices for physical activity and sports, (3) mobile apps and wearable devices for diet, (4) mobile apps and wearable devices for mental health, and (5) preferences regarding mobile apps and wearable devices. Participants were eligible if they were young adults who reported using at least one app or wearable device to monitor at least one health variable (eg, steps, training, sleep, calorie intake). No additional eligibility criteria were applied. Results: A total of 693 questionnaires were analyzed for aims 1 and 4, with the sample showing an equal gender distribution (females: 363/693, 52.4%). For aims 2 and 3, a total of 317 questionnaires were included. Participants using an app or wearable for physical activity accounted for 320 (46.2%), while 60 (8.7%) and 156 (22.5%) reported use for diet and mental health, respectively. Moreover, the frequency of use was predominantly on a daily basis, particularly for wearables. The app and wearable characteristics identified as most important were user-friendliness, free access to content, loading speed, and icon clarity. Conclusions: Findings suggest that Italian young adults, particularly women, predominantly use wearables over apps to track health data, with both being checked on a daily basis. Physical activity is the most frequently monitored domain, likely due to its ease of tracking, while diet and mental health receive less attention. Overall, these tools are used more for monitoring than for actively improving health-related variables. The most valued characteristics identified by young adults include ease of use, free access to all content, and fast loading speed. These insights should guide the design and refinement of digital health interventions targeting this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.