Trial reportBlood advances2025
Impact of tranexamic acid on postpartum hemorrhage in type 1 von Willebrand disease treated with recombinant VWF.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04344860 (Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Recombinant Von Willebrand Factor), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Recombinant Von Willebrand Factor (rVWF) Plus Tranexamic Acid vs. rVWF Alone to Reduce Postpartum Hemorrhage in Women With Von Willebrand Disease: The VWD-WOMAN Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractPostpartum hemorrhage (PPH) affects up to 44% of women with von Willebrand disease (VWD) despite von Willebrand factor (VWF) replacement. Because tranexamic acid (TXA) reduced PPH-related deaths in the WOMAN trial, we assessed whether TXA combined with rVWF vs rVWF alone prevents PPH in VWD. VWD-Woman, a phase 3, open-label, randomized pilot trial, enrolled pregnant women with VWD, aged ≥18 years (von Willebrand Factor Ristocetin Cofactor activity [VWF:RCo] of <0.50 IU/mL, bleeding history). Participants received IV rVWF 80 IU/kg at delivery and postpartum days 1 and 2, with or without TXA (1 g within 3 hours of delivery). The primary outcome was quantitative blood loss (QBL) at delivery. Secondary outcomes included 21-day pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC) scores, hemoglobin changes, transfusions, hysterectomy, and safety. Of 103 screened, 40 were eligible, and 20 enrolled (10 per group), 100% were iron-deficient. Mean QBL was similar (TXA + rVWF: 727.0 mL; 95% CI, 434.5-1019.5] vs rVWF: 539.7 mL [95% CI, 132.8-946.6]; P = 0.41), as were rates of PPH (30% in both groups). No differences were observed in hemoglobin change (-1.90 g/dL vs -1.42 g/dL, P = 0.49) or 21-day PBAC score (467.1 vs 344.8, P = 0.32). Stratified analyses showed no differences by age, body mass index, VWF activity, or delivery type. No serious adverse events or thrombosis occurred. TXA plus rVWF is feasible and safe in type 1 VWD, but in this small pilot study, was not associated with a reduction in PPH compared with rVWF alone. Iron deficiency is prevalent. Further studies are needed to improve PPH prevention in VWD. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04344860.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.