Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40902085›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2025

An AI model classifies risks of early relapse post-CAR T-cell therapy in a multicenter real-world population with DLBCL.

Michelle Wang, Krishna V Komanduri, Debajyoti Datta, Ayan Patel, Barbee Whitaker, Artur Belov, Benjamin Rubin, Rohit Vashist, Rosa Rodriguez-Monguio, Pelin Cinar and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michelle WangBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-3207-1490
Krishna V KomanduriDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Debajyoti DattaBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Ayan PatelBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Barbee WhitakerOffice of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-6311-6268
Artur BelovOffice of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-6848-1224
Benjamin RubinBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Rohit VashistBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Rosa Rodriguez-MonguioDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-5526-9395
Pelin CinarHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Steven AndersonCenter for Data-driven Insights and Innovation, University of California Health, Oakland, CA.
Atul J ButteBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractAccumulating real-world (RW) evidence of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) has demonstrated comparable performance to that of pivotal trials. However, ∼57% of patients eventually relapse, with most requiring additional therapies. Being able to identify patients with risk of early relapse enables clinicians to consider additional interventions to extend survival outcomes. This study aimed to first comprehensively evaluate the RW performance of axi-cel in the multicenter University of California Health Systems using automated computational approaches. Second, we developed a decision tree machine learning (ML) model to identify patients with risks of early relapse within 6 months. A total of 416 adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving axi-cel between 2017 and 2024 were included in the study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.1 and 54.4 months; the 18-month PFS and OS rates were 41.6% and 65.5%, respectively. Severe CRS and ICANS were observed in 18.8% and 32.5% of patients. The ML model, relying on age and 6 routinely measured laboratory tests (lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, ferritin, hematocrit, platelet count, and prothrombin time), achieved a high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score of 0.82. The decision curve analysis indicated positive net benefit of the model across a broad range (0-0.7) of decision thresholds, suggesting clinical utility in diverse scenarios. This study further confirmed the RW performance of axi-cel in diverse populations. Our ML model represented a novel approach to identify patients that may benefit from additional interventions to extend survival outcomes. Following prospective confirmation study, our model and decision tree approach may support clinical decision making in patients with high-risk DLBCL.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMachine LearningAdultAgedBiological ProductsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceaxicabtagene ciloleucelBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID40902085
PMCPMC12663514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.