ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Deciphering enzymatic potential in metagenomic reads through DNA language models.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 16S rRNA sequence captures microbial functional potential.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Quantifying uncertainty in protein representations across models and tasks.Nature methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial communities drive essential global processes, yet much of their functional potential remains unexplored. Metagenomics stands to elucidate this microbial "dark matter" by directly sequencing the microbial community DNA from environmental samples. However, the exploration of metagenomic sequences is mostly limited to establishing their similarity to curated reference sequences. A paradigm shift-language model (LM)-based methods-offers promising avenues for reference-free analysis of metagenomic reads. Here, we introduce two LMs, a pretrained foundation model REMME (Read EMbedder for Metagenomic Exploration), aimed at understanding the DNA context of metagenomic reads, and the fine-tuned REBEAN (Read Embedding-Based Enzyme ANnotator) for predicting the enzymatic potential encoded within the read-corresponding genes. By emphasizing function recognition over gene identification, REBEAN labels gene-encoded molecular functions of previously explored and new (orphan) sequences. Even though it was not trained to do so, REBEAN identifies the gene's function-relevant parts. It thus expands enzymatic annotation of unassembled metagenomic reads. Here, we present novel enzymes discovered using our models, highlighting model impact on our understanding of microbial communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.