Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901908›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Leveraging synthetic data produced from museum specimens to train adaptable species classification models.

Jarrett D Blair, Kamal Khidas, Katie E Marshall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jarrett D BlairDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9132-8102
Kamal KhidasBeaty Center for Species Discovery, Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Katie E MarshallDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6991-4957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer vision has increasingly shown potential to improve data processing efficiency in ecological research. However, training computer vision models requires large amounts of high-quality, annotated training data. This poses a significant challenge for researchers looking to create bespoke computer vision models, as substantial human resources and biological replicates are often needed to adequately train these models. Synthetic images have been proposed as a potential solution for generating large training datasets, but models trained with synthetic images often have poor generalization to real photographs. Here we present a modular pipeline for training generalizable classification models using synthetic images. Our pipeline includes 3D asset creation with the use of 3D scanners, synthetic image generation with open-source computer graphic software, and domain adaptive classification model training. We demonstrate our pipeline by applying it to skulls of 16 mammal species in the order Carnivora. We explore several domain adaptation techniques, including maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) loss, fine-tuning, and data supplementation. Using our pipeline, we were able to improve classification accuracy on real photographs from 55.4% to a maximum of 95.1%. We also conducted qualitative analysis with t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) to compare different domain adaptation techniques. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using synthetic images for ecological computer vision and highlight the potential of museum specimens and 3D assets for scalable, generalizable model training.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedAnimalsImaging, Three-DimensionalMammalsMuseumsSkullSoftware

Identifiers

PMID40901908
PMCPMC12407421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.