Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901901›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Training and competency frameworks used in the preparation of healthcare professionals for head and neck cancer screening: A scoping review protocol.

Louise C Occomore-Kent, Charitini Stavropoulou, Elizabeth C Ward, Chris Elkington, John C Hardman, Joanne M Patterson, Nikki Rousseau, Vinidh Paleri, Madeline Cruice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Louise C Occomore-KentSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6212-5461
Charitini StavropoulouSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth C WardSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Chris ElkingtonHead and Neck Cancer United Kingdom, Bury St Edmunds, United Kingdom.
John C HardmanThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Joanne M PattersonLiverpool Head and Neck Centre, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Nikki RousseauLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Vinidh PaleriThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Madeline CruiceSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis scoping review aims to identify existing training and competency frameworks for healthcare professionals who assess or screen patients on the suspected Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) pathway or in extended practice models, and to explore how skills are developed, and competence assessed, prior to practice.

introductionUp to 97% of people referred with suspected HNC in the UK do not have cancer. This contributes to long wait lists and referral to treatment time in HNC services. A potential solution is for Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) to assist such services by screening low-risk patients, specifically those presenting with hoarseness or oral-pharyngeal dysphagia. If SLTs are to screen low-risk patients safely and effectively, then specific training and competencies are required. INCLUSION CRITERIA: International sources written in English between 2014-2025 that involve training and competencies for healthcare professionals who assess or screen patients for HNC.

methodsThe protocol presents the scoping review process that will be undertaken, which will be conducted as per the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidance. Five databases and grey literature will be searched using a peer-reviewed search strategy. Professional organisations will be contacted for unpublished tools from clinical practice. Titles and abstracts will be screened using an a priori protocol. Eligible sources will be charted using an a priori framework and will undergo deductive content analysis. Results will be reported quantitatively and qualitatively using flow charts, tables and visual representations to outline the process and present the results.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEarly Detection of CancerHead and Neck NeoplasmsHealth PersonnelHumansScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40901901
PMCPMC12407448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.