Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901896›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

ICMC: An Interpretable Cross-domain Multi-modal Classification model for grading teaching plan.

Jin Jin, Fan Wang, Shengzheng Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jin JinSchool of Information and Intelligent Engineering, Zhejiang Wanli University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5655-7567
Fan WangZHONGTIETONG Rail Transit Operation Co. Ltd., Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Shengzheng TianSchool of Information and Intelligent Engineering, Zhejiang Wanli University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-modal classification aims to extract pertinent information from various modalities to assign labels to instances. The advent of deep neural networks has significantly advanced this task. However, the majority of current deep neural networks lack interpretability, leading to skepticism. This issue is particularly pronounced in sensitive domains such as educational assessment. In order to address the trust deficit in deep neural networks for multi-modal classification tasks, we propose an Interpretable Multi-modal Classification framework (ICMC), which enhances confidence in the processes and outcomes of deep neural networks while maintaining interpretability and improving performance. Specifically, our approach incorporates a confidence-driven attention mechanism at the intermediate layer of the deep neural network, assessing attention scores and discerning anomalous information from both local and global perspectives. Furthermore, a confidence probability mechanism is implemented at the output layer, leveraging both local and global perspectives to bolster result confidence. Additionally, we meticulously curate multi-modal datasets for automatic lesson plan scoring research, making them openly available to the community. Quantitative experiments on educational and medical datasets confirm that ICMC outperforms state-of-the-art models (HMCAN, MCAN, HGLNet) by 2.5-6.0% in accuracy and 3.1-7.2% in F1-score, while reducing computational latency by 18%. Cross-domain validation demonstrates 15.7% higher generalizability than transformer-based approaches (CLIP), establishing its interpretability through attention visualization and confidence scoring.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementNeural Networks, ComputerTeachingDeep LearningHumans

Identifiers

PMID40901896
PMCPMC12407483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.