Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901870›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Effect of plastic and seaweed shelters on the skin microbiome of lumpfish Cyclopterus lumpus used as cleaner fish in aquaculture pens.

Ása Jacobsen, Agnes Mols Mortensen, Kirstin Eliasen, Elin Egholm, Marner Nolsøe, Ása Johannesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ása JacobsenDepartment of Biotechnology, Firum PF, Tórshavn, The Faroe Islands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2574-7448
Agnes Mols MortensenDepartment of Research, Tari Spf., Fámjin, The Faroe Islands.
Kirstin EliasenDepartment of Fish Health, Firum PF, Hvalvík, The Faroe Islands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4592-4227
Elin EgholmDepartment of Biotechnology, Firum PF, Tórshavn, The Faroe Islands.
Marner NolsøeQuality Department, Bakkafrost, Glyvrar, The Faroe Islands.
Ása JohannesenDepartment of Ecology, Firum PF, Hvalvík, The Faroe Islands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-4013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture is a major industry in several countries worldwide and a growing enterprise in others. One of the main challenges the industry faces is infestations with the parasitic copepod Lepeoptheirus salmonis, or salmon lice. Several different chemical and mechanical methods are available for alleviating the problem, but often at cost to salmon welfare and/or the environment. In some regions cleaner fish have been introduced to farming facilities as an environmentally and salmon welfare friendly option for reducing sea lice infestations. In some North Atlantic countries, lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) are being used as cleaner fish. However, poor welfare and high mortality rates of lumpfish in salmon farming are frequent issues, and the need to improve lumpfish welfare is great. One adaptation for salmon farms is to provide the lumpfish with shelters to meet their need to rest and hide. Plastic shelters are the most widely used form, but seaweed shelters have more recently also been applied as a more natural solution. This project investigated the potential effect of seaweed and plastic shelters on the skin and gill microbiome of lumpfish and any potential correlation to their welfare. In an experimental setup in a commercial salmon farming facility, lumpfish from pens with either plastic or seaweed shelters were sampled over a period of approximately three months. The results showed that the bacterial communities on the two shelter types were significantly different and fewer potentially pathogenic bacteria dominated the skin microbiome of lumpfish living with seaweed shelters than of those living with plastic shelters. No differences were detected in the welfare of the lumpfish and further investigations are needed to clarify any potential implications of the differences detected in the skin microbiome of lumpfish including responses to stressful conditions.

Indexed as

AquacultureMicrobiotaPerciformesPlasticsSeaweedSkinAnimalsCopepodaGillsSalmo salarSkin MicrobiomePlastics

Identifiers

PMID40901870
PMCPMC12407482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.