Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901842›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Before the wave: Exploring early perspectives on COVID-19 self-testing among African Americans in Eastern North Carolina.

Tiarney D Ritchwood, Kelsey Burton, Mysha Wynn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tiarney D RitchwoodWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1612-7319
Kelsey BurtonWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.
Mysha WynnProject Momentum, Rocky Mount, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

RADx-UP SAY YES COVID Test Study (S4)U24MD016258 · NIMHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN-WOLKOWIEZ, MICHAEL, DAVE, GAURAV J · 2020 to 2023
$116.7M
Community-Academic Partnerships to Address COVID-19 Inequities within African American CommunitiesDP2MD017444 · NIMHD · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RITCHWOOD, TIARNEY D · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
Leveraging artificial intelligence and social innovation to reduce disparities in COVID-19 testing among African Americans (Supplement)U01MD018306 · NIMHD · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RITCHWOOD, TIARNEY D · 2023 to 2023
$1.1M
NIMHD NIH HHS DP2 MD017444NIMHD NIH HHS U01 MD018306NIMHD NIH HHS U24 MD016258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, African Americans in rural communities faced disproportionate rates of hospitalizations and deaths. The emergence of the omicron variant further exacerbated these disparities, with African American adults approximately four times more likely to be hospitalized for COVID-19 compared to their White counterparts. To curb the transmission of the virus, public health professionals advocated COVID-19 mitigation strategies, including testing. However, barriers such as limited testing sites, long wait times, and privacy concerns hindered testing accessibility in rural areas. This study characterizes the early perceptions and acceptability of COVID-19 self-testing among African Americans in eastern North Carolina.

methodWe conducted semi-structured, small group discussions in November 2021 with participants representing three age groups (youth, adults, and older adults) from Eastern North Carolina. Data were analyzed thematically using deductive and inductive approaches.

resultsFindings indicate that, while self-testing was a novel concept for many participants, there was a high acceptability of COVID-19 self-testing. Barriers included low self-efficacy, concerns about test accuracy, and perceived costs. Participants emphasized the convenience and comfort of self-testing, recommending clear instructions, video demonstrations, and a toll-free number for help.

conclusionsThese insights offer valuable guidance for improving emergency testing strategies and protocols in response to future viral outbreaks and pandemic threats. Clear, user-friendly instructions and video demonstrations can enhance the accessibility of self-testing kits. Moreover, addressing concerns related to cost and test accuracy is crucial for widespread adoption. Public health campaigns should prioritize affordability, user-friendliness, and community-specific needs to foster resilience and equity in healthcare responses.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingSelf-TestingAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaPandemicsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSARS-CoV-2Young Adult

Identifiers

PMID40901842
PMCPMC12407405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.