Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901840›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Assessing Knowledge, Uptake and Factors associated with cervical cancer screening among women in selected communities of Wakiso district in Uganda: A population-based study.

Robert M Bulamba, Emmanuel Kyasanku, Fred Nalugoda, Alex Daama, James Nkale, Amanda Pearl Miller, William Byansi, Juliana Namutundu, Godfrey Kigozi, Grace Kigozi Nalwoga and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Robert M BulambaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-7870-5041
Emmanuel KyasankuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Kampala, Uganda.
Fred NalugodaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Kampala, Uganda.
Alex DaamaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Kampala, Uganda.
James NkaleDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Kampala, Uganda.
Amanda Pearl MillerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.
William ByansiDepartment of Social Work, School of Social work Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Juliana NamutunduDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health (MakSPH)), Kampala, Uganda.
Godfrey KigoziDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Kampala, Uganda.
Grace Kigozi NalwogaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Kampala, Uganda.
Chris BalwanakiDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health (MakSPH)), Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-1539-4116
Stephen WatyaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Kampala, Uganda.
Anna Mia EkströmDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stephen MugambaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Kampala, Uganda.
Rawlance NdejjoDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health (MakSPH)), Kampala, Uganda.
Gertrude NakigoziDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUganda has the highest prevalence and incidence of cervical cancer in the East African region, with 80% of women diagnosed at advanced stage when survival is minimal. Literature on uptake of cervical cancer screening is limited in Uganda and thus womens' knowledge and uptake of cervical cancer screening in the general population remains unknown. This study examined this gap of knowledge among women aged 25-65 years, across rural, urban and semi urban communities in a Ugandan district to inform design of targeted future cervical cancer screening programs in the country.

methodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Wakiso district, Uganda in May 2024 among 783 eligible women. Face-to-face interviews were conducted. Uptake of cervical cancer screening (outcome of interest) was dichotomously (yes/no) assessed. Knowledge of cervical cancer disease was assessed using the AWACAN validated tool, knowledge of cervical cancer screening was assessed using a set of ten (10) questions adapted from previous studies elsewhere, and all were measured on a Likert scale. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariable Poisson regression models with robust variance were performed using Stata software version 17.

resultsRespondents' median age was 31 years (IQR 27-39 years). Majority (89.5%, 701/783) had heard of cervical cancer, and 90.6% (635/701) were aware of screening. Median knowledge score on signs and symptoms, risk factors and cervical cancer screening was 8.0 (IQR = 5-10), 8.0 (IQR = 5-11) and 7.0 (IQR = 4-10) respectively, and 54.3% had high knowledge about cervical cancer screening. Uptake of cervical cancer screening was 33.4%. Living in urban areas (aPR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05-1.88), being the ages 40-49 years (aPR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.36-2.27), 50 years and above (APR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.53-3.04), smoking (aPR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.05-1.86), partner involvement (aPR = 2.61, 95% CI: 2.12-3.21), high knowledge about cervical cancer screening (aPR = 3.29, 95% CI: 2.35-4.60), and living with HIV (aPR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.66-2.13) were significantly associated with higher uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in this setting.

conclusionKnowledge of cervical cancer screening was high, but the uptake of cervical cancer screening was lower than the recommended population coverage by WHO and Uganda national guidelines. There is need to improve accessibility to cervical cancer screening, increase nationwide cervical cancer awareness campaigns focusing on high-risk age groups and design targeted, tailored, culturally and socially sensitive interventions for young women aged 25-39 years to improve cervical cancer screening in Uganda.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRural PopulationUganda

Identifiers

PMID40901840
PMCPMC12407468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.