ArticlePloS one2025
Explainable mortality prediction models incorporating social health determinants and physical frailty for heart failure patients.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is limited evidence on how social determinants of health (SDOH) and physical frailty (PF) influence mortality prediction in heart failure (HF), particularly for in-hospital, 90-day, and 1-year outcomes. This study aims to develop explainable machine learning (ML) models to assess the prognostic value of SDOH and PF at multiple time points. We analyzed data from adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for the first time with a diagnosis of HF. Key variables extracted from electronic health records included SDOH (e.g., primary language, insurance type), PF indicators (Braden mobility, nutrition, activity, and fall risk scores), vital signs, laboratory tests, and lung sounds (LS) from both ICU admission and discharge. We employed the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm to build models for short- and long-term mortality prediction, and used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to interpret model outputs and quantify the importance of each feature. The observed mortality rates were 14.8% in-hospital (n = 12,856), 7.0% at 90 days (n = 10,990), and 13.5% at 1 year (n = 10,221). The prediction models achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) scores of 0.836 (95% CI: 0.831-0.844) for in-hospital, 0.790 (95% CI: 0.780-0.800) for 90-day, and 0.789 (95% CI: 0.780-0.799) for 1-year mortality. These models outperformed baseline ML algorithms and conventional clinical risk scores. Key predictors of HF outcomes included age, fall risk, primary language, blood urea nitrogen, comorbidities, urine output, insurance type, and LS findings. Incorporating PF at ICU admission and discharge, along with SDOH such as language proficiency and insurance status, could enhance the identification of high-risk HF patients and may inform targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.