ArticlePloS one2025
Psychometric validation of a culturally adapted health belief model scale for breast cancer screening in Chinese women.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of health belief model (HBM) in health sciences and medical researches: systematic review on African and Asian countries.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Feasibility, Usability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of an mHealth App to Promote Screening Behaviors Among High-Risk Populations for Breast Cancer: Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Trial
- Modeling breast cancer screening hesitancy among Chinese women: integrating the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice, health belief, and 5 C frameworks.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Scale to Assess Cancer Health Education Outcomes in Patients.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to validate a culturally adapted Health Belief Model (HBM) questionnaire for assessing breast cancer screening beliefs among Chinese women and to evaluate its structural validity and measurement invariance. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 314 women aged 18-70 in Guizhou Province, China, using multistage sampling. The original HBM questionnaire underwent cultural adaptation and expert content review. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to examine the factor structure, and measurement invariance was tested across residential settings and age groups. A seven-factor solution was identified, encompassing all six core HBM constructs, with self-efficacy splitting into two empirically distinct dimensions. The final 41-item model demonstrated strong model fit (CFI = 0.914, TLI = 0.906, RMSEA = 0.059, SRMR = 0.060), high internal consistency (ω ≥ 0.88), and full invariance across subgroups. Convergent validity and inter-construct correlations aligned with theoretical expectations. In particular, strong positive associations were observed among self-efficacy, perceived benefits, and cues to action, while perceived barriers showed inverse relationships with perceived severity and risk perception. These findings offer empirical justification for both single-construct and multi-construct intervention strategies. The validated scale provides a psychometrically sound and culturally grounded tool for identifying psychological barriers to screening among Chinese women. It may guide the design of theory-informed public health interventions that address individual belief profiles and promote screening uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.