Observational studyPloS one2025
Effect of planned preoperative oral care implemented at least 2 weeks before surgery on postoperative infections: A single-center retrospective observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate whether initiating oral care more than 2 weeks before surgery could prevent postoperative infections, particularly pneumonia. This retrospective observational study analyzed 1,806 patients who underwent surgery at the Ehime University Hospital between April 2019 and March 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: those receiving structured oral care at least 2 weeks before surgery (n = 257) and those receiving late or no oral care (n = 1,549). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to minimize selection bias. Nevertheless, residual confounding factors, especially confounding by indication, may remain, because as patients who received early oral care may differ systematically from those who did not. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of postoperative pneumonia. After PSM and IPTW analyses, the early oral care group showed significantly lower rates of postoperative pneumonia than the control group (risk difference: -3.56%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.89% to -2.23%, p = 0.0004 in the matched analysis; -3.68%, 95% CI: -4.61% to -2.75%, p < 0.001 in the IPTW analysis). IPTW analysis demonstrated shorter hospital stays in the early oral care than in the control group (mean difference: -2.65 days, 95% CI: -4.75 to -0.55, p = 0.013). Implementing structured oral care at least 2 weeks before surgery reduced postoperative pneumonia and shortened hospital stays across various surgical procedures, suggesting its value as a preventive strategy for improving surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.