ArticlePloS one2025
Medical associations' guidance on caring for patients experiencing incarceration in the United States.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Capturing incarceration in the medical record: we cannot manage what we cannot measure.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The United States has one of the highest incarceration rates in the world. Carceral status can complicate clinical encounters in community and academic settings for an already medically vulnerable population. While it is likely physicians will encounter patients experiencing incarceration in their practice, there are few educational opportunities dedicated to ensuring delivery of healthcare that protects patient dignity, autonomy, and privacy. Professional medical associations can play a role in filling this physician knowledge gap. The goal of this analysis is to catalogue and analyze the current landscape of official medical association documents addressing healthcare of people experiencing incarceration. A systematic Internet search was conducted of American Medical Association House of Delegates associations and their existing documents. Out of 116 associations included in the systematic search, 16 groups published materials on incarceration. From these 16 associations, 44 documents were identified and coded thematically. Documents served four main purposes: education on incarceration (28/44), clinical guidance (25/44), logistical guidance (27/44), and policy advocacy (30/44). Common topics included medical conditions of people experiencing incarceration, patient factors antecedent to incarceration, and specialty or population-specific information. Few medical associations have published material on incarceration and the paucity of pragmatic clinical guidance was particularly pronounced. A lack of resources from medical associations can lead to variability and lapses in best healthcare practices when treating patients experiencing incarceration. Medical associations should consider developing guidance for clinicians to maximize this patient population's autonomy and dignity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.