ArticleJournal of neuropathology and experimental neurology2025
3D spatial sampling to quantify morphologic heterogeneity in isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype glioblastoma.
Article in Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in digital pathology and machine learning have the potential to revolutionize diagnostic neuropathology. Current brain tumor models are typically trained and validated using morphologic features from a single hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slide per patient. Yet, brain tumors such as diffuse glioma are known for their epigenetic, genetic, and transcriptional heterogeneity within an individual patient. The impact of this heterogeneity on model accuracy and development is unknown. To quantitatively investigate morphologic intratumoral heterogeneity in glioblastoma (GBM), we acquired 92 regionally distinct samples representing maximal tumor sampling across 10 patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype GBM and quantified cell density, nucleus area, and nucleus circularity from whole-slide scanned images of H&E-stained slides. All 3 parameters exhibited significant morphologic variation between tumors from different patients and within a given tumor. To identify potential drivers of this variation, tumor-level and sample-level mutation profiling was performed. Mutations in tumor protein 53 both at the tumor level and the sample level had larger nuclear area and decreased nuclear circularity. Morphological features were not associated with regional location within the tumor. Accurate and robust H&E-based models to improve diagnosis and disease prognostication may require training sets that incorporate multiple spatially distinct samples per patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.