Trial reportWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Efficacy of N-acetylcysteine
Trial report in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dexamethasone and N-acetylcysteine for the prevention of post-embolization syndrome following transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Added value of the albumin-bilirubin score in predicting liver-related complications and mortality in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major health concern in Thailand, with most patients diagnosed at the intermediate stage. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment; however, postembolization syndrome (PES) remains a common complication. Although both dexamethasone (DEXA) and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) have shown efficacy in reducing PES, no study has directly compared their effects.
aimTo compare the incidence of PES between DEXA and NAC in intermediate-stage HCC patients undergoing conventional TACE (cTACE).
methodsA randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted at two tertiary hospitals in Thailand from November 2024 to April 2025. Eligible HCC patients (aged 18-70 years) were randomized (1:1) to receive either NAC (150 mg/kg/hour loading dose, followed by 50 mg/kg over 4 hours, then 6.25 mg/kg/ hour for 48 hours post-cTACE) or DEXA (8 mg IV 1 hour before cTACE). cTACE was performed by blinded interventional radiologists. The primary outcome was PES occurrence within 48 hours, assessed using South West Oncology Group toxicity coding and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The secondary outcomes were post-cTACE liver decompensation and the dynamic changes in the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score.
resultsA total of 56 intermediate-stage HCC patients were included (DEXA,
conclusionCompared with DEXA, NAC significantly reduces the incidence of PES, regardless of its impact on liver function recovery. Therefore, NAC is a preferable option for reducing PES in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-B stage HCC patients with preserved liver function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.