Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901680›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2025

Continuous Glucose Monitoring During Recreational Diving in Type 1 Diabetes: Navigating Clinical and Technical Uncertainties.

Djordje S Popovic, Theocharis Koufakis, Dimitrios Patoulias, Anca Pantea Stoian, Nikolaos Papanas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Djordje S PopovicClinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-2763-1326
Theocharis KoufakisSecond Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5853-1352
Dimitrios PatouliasSecond Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6899-684X
Anca Pantea StoianDepartment of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Nikolaos PapanasDiabetes Centre, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7320-785X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recreational diving with self-contained underwater breathing devices is gaining popularity worldwide as a sport and leisure activity. People living with type 1 diabetes mellitus (PLT1D) are no exception, although historically diabetes mellitus, especially insulin-treated, has been described as an absolute contra-indication for diving. However, based on observational data collected by the Divers Alert Network, the presence of background diabetes mellitus became only a relative contraindication for those without significant co-morbidities or long-term complications. Regarding diving activities among PLT1D, the primary concern is the risk of hypoglycaemia, especially in those with impaired awareness. Furthermore, symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia could be confused with those originating from other factors related to diving. Although avoidance of hypoglycaemia is imperative among PLT1D practicing diving, the risk of severe hyperglycaemia should also be minimised. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) nowadays represents the standard of care for PLT1D, but its accuracy during diving activities is still a matter of debate. This commentary aims to summarize the existing data on accuracy, durability, and underwater performance of different CGM devices among PLT1D who engage in diving, and to call for additional research in the field. Based on available results, the application of real-time CGM still requires extreme caution since none of the existing systems has so far met the standards for accurate use in underwater conditions. Further improvements of contemporary CGM devices, validated through large-scale trials, are necessary before their widespread implementation among PLT1D practicing diving. Such advances should further enhance safety during this popular activity.

Indexed as

continuous glucose monitoringdivingtype 1 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID40901680
PMCPMC12399892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.