Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901640›Full record

ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2025

Early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis among patients with chronic back pain using a clinical screening tool and referral strategy.

Abhijeet Danve, Swetha Alexander, Yuliya Afinogenova, Andrew Haims, Hong-Jai Park, Kaitlin R Maciejewski, Yanhong Deng, William Odell, Nicolas Page, Insoo Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abhijeet DanveDepartment of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Swetha AlexanderDepartment of Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8478-3326
Yuliya AfinogenovaDivision of Rheumatology, Atlantic Health System, Morristown, NJ, USA.
Andrew HaimsDepartment of Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Hong-Jai ParkDepartment of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kaitlin R MaciejewskiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yanhong DengDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
William OdellDepartment of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Nicolas PageDepartment of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Insoo KangDepartment of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Lack of timely referral of suspected axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients to rheumatologists is an important modifiable reason for diagnostic delay of axSpA. We assessed the usefulness of a self-referral strategy using a clinical feature-based screening questionnaire (SQ) (A-tool). Methods: Finding axSpA (FaxSpA) was single-centre prospective study involving patients with chronic back pain (CBP). The A-tool, consisting of a three-question prescreen and eight-question SQ, was distributed to patients via the patient communication portal and university Facebook page. Patients with affirmative responses on all three prescreen questions, and three or more questions on SQ were eligible for study visit. Enrolled patients underwent history, physical examination, labs (CRP and HLA-B27) and imaging studies (X-ray and MRI of the pelvis). The clinician's judgement was considered the gold standard for diagnosing axSpA. Results: Eighty-six of the 100 enrolled patients completed all the study procedures, and 29 (34%) were diagnosed with axSpA. Seven patients had AS, and 22 had non-radiographic axSpA. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual A-tool questions for diagnosing axSpA ranged from 0.03 to 0.86 and 0.14 to 0.96, respectively. Positive likelihood ratios (+LR) of the individual items in the A-tool ranged from 0.84 to 1.34. There was low to moderate agreement between the patient responses on the online A-tool and the corresponding physician-confirmed responses. Conclusion: A tool-based strategy for self-referral of CBP patients is a simple, practical and feasible approach for early diagnosis of axSpA. We need a larger prospective study to validate our findings.

Indexed as

ASaxial spondyloarthritisinflammatory back painreferralscreening tool

Identifiers

PMID40901640
PMCPMC12401578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.