ReviewUS cardiology2025
Exploring Exercise-induced Long QT: A Scoping Review of Reversibility Through Detraining and Distinction from Long QT Syndrome.
Review in US cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The FIB-4 Index Is Independently Associated with QTc Interval in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exercise-induced long QT may mimic congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS), risking misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment. This scoping review explores its reversibility through detraining and differentiation from congenital LQTS. A systematic search of five databases identified six studies involving 196 subjects. Results showed that exercise-induced long QT is reversible, with QT intervals normalizing after detraining, typically over 1-6 months. Unlike congenital LQTS, affected athletes often lacked genetic mutations or family histories linked to the condition. The difference between congenital LQTS and exercise-induced long QT lies in the reversibility of QT interval prolongation. In those with exercise-induced long QT, the prolonged QT interval would return to normal levels with detraining, unlike in congenital LQTS. Further long-term follow-up is needed to assess the potential arrhythmic risk associated with re-exposure to intensive training. Additionally, negative genetic testing and absence of family history do not entirely exclude congenital LQTS nor indicate benignity, emphasizing the need for careful clinical assessment beyond these factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.