Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901631›Full record

ArticleSocial policy & administration2024

National charitable fundraising for the NHS, 1948-2023.

Ellen Stewart, Rosemary Cresswell, Christian Möller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social policy & administration, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. National charitable fundraising for the NHS, 1948-2023.Social policy & administration · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ellen StewartUniversity of Glasgow Glasgow UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-1477
Rosemary CresswellUniversity of Strathclyde Glasgow UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5203-7994
Christian MöllerUniversity of Strathclyde Glasgow UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1731-5431

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether charitable fundraising might play a part in funding Britain's ostensibly tax-funded NHS has been a longstanding dilemma, which until recently has received only occasional scholarly attention. In 1946, Aneurin Bevan argued that one of the main goals of the reformed health care system was to liberate health care from the 'caprice of private charity'. Seven decades later, NHS Charities Together's Urgent Covid-19 Appeal became a powerful societal rallying cry in the health emergency of the pandemic and raised £150 million in the process. This paper draws together findings from new archival research, a witness seminar with key actors in the NHS charity sector, and qualitative research based on interviews with NHS charity staff and trustees (

Indexed as

health care, economics ofhealth care systemshealth policy

Identifiers

PMID40901631
PMCPMC12400009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.