ReviewWorld journal of hepatology2025
Advances in portal pressure measurement: Endoscopic techniques, challenges, and implications for liver transplantation.
Review in World journal of hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07703540 (Inferior Vena Cava Pressure as Alternative to Hepatic Venous Pressure for EUS-guided Portal Pressure Gradient Measurement), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Inferior Vena Cava Pressure as Alternative to Hepatic Venous Pressure for EUS-guided Portal Pressure Gradient Measurement
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Portal hypertension is a critical determinant of prognosis in chronic liver disease and a key factor in evaluating candidates for liver transplantation. Traditional methods such as hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement have long been considered the gold standard for assessing portal pressure. However, these methods are invasive and carry procedural limitations. Recent advances in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided techniques have emerged as promising alternatives, offering direct and minimally invasive assessment of portal pressure. EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement enables real-time evaluation of haemodynamic through direct access to the portal system. This technique has shown to be as accurate as HVPG, and it has some extra benefits, like the ability to take liver biopsies and check collateral circulation all at the same time. Despite these benefits, the technique poses challenges such as operator dependence, procedural complexity, and limited standardization across centres. This minireview highlights the evolution of portal pressure measurement, focusing on the potential of EUS-guided techniques in pre-transplant assessment, risk stratification, and monitoring therapeutic outcomes. Furthermore, it discusses the technical challenges, clinical implications, and future directions for integrating these innovations into routine practice. Advances in portal pressure measurement hold significant promise for enhancing decision-making and outcomes in liver transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.