SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Progress and trends on machine learning in proteomics during 1997-2024: a bibliometric analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Macroalgal Bloom Biomass as a Source of Bioactive Compounds and Antimicrobial Peptides.Marine drugs · 2026Article
- Recent Developments and Applications of Capillary and Microchip Electrophoresis in Proteomics and Peptidomics (2023-2025).Journal of separation science · 2026Review
- Proteomic Studies for the Identification and Characterization of Marine Bioactive Molecules.Marine drugs · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Despite growing interest in the application of machine learning (ML) in proteomics, a comprehensive and systematic mapping of this research domain has been lacking. This study addresses this gap by conducting the first large-scale bibliometric analysis focused exclusively on ML-driven proteomics, aiming to elucidate its knowledge structure, development trajectory, and emerging research trends. Methods: A total of 5,156 publications from the Web of Science Core Collection (1997-2024) were retrieved and analyzed. Bibliometric tools including CiteSpace 6.4.R1, VOSviewer 1.6.18, Scimago Graphica, and the R package bibliometrix were used to extract and visualize key bibliometric indicators. After data cleaning and de-duplication, analyses were conducted on keyword co-occurrence, citation networks, leading journals, influential authors, and institutional collaboration patterns to construct a comprehensive landscape of ML applications in proteomics. Results: The number of publications has grown exponentially since 2010, with an average annual growth rate of 12.53% and a notable surge of 65.14% occurring between 2019 and 2020. The United States emerged as the most productive country, while the Chinese Academy of Sciences led among institutions. AlphaFold2-related research received the highest citations, reflecting the transformative role of deep learning in protein structure prediction. Thematic clustering revealed key research foci, including deep learning algorithms, protein-protein interaction prediction, and integrative multi-omics analysis. The field is characterized by strong interdisciplinary convergence, involving computer science, molecular biology, and clinical research. High-impact journals and influential authors were also identified, providing benchmarks for academic influence and collaboration. Conclusion: This study offers the first comprehensive bibliometric analysis of ML in proteomics, revealing key themes such as deep learning, pretrained models, and multi-omics integration. Future efforts should focus on building interpretable models, enhancing cross-disciplinary collaboration, and ensuring secure, standardized data use to advance precision medicine. Systematic review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/F4WUG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.