ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Introduction of ultrasound-guided axillary vein approach for central venous catheterization in severely injured trauma patients: characteristics and concerns.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive management of hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infections: a narrative review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Axillary Versus Subclavian Venous Access for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: Complications, Evolving Techniques and Practical Recommendations.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The ultrasound-guided axillary vein approach for central venous catheterization (UAVC) demonstrates high success rates and low complications; however, its utilization in trauma care settings remains limited. This study aimed to characterize UAVC practices in a trauma intensive care unit (TICU) at a tertiary teaching hospital, specifically investigating optimal catheter positioning, procedure-related complications, and risk factors associated with catheter inaccurate placement and venous thromboembolism (VTE) development. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on trauma patients who underwent UAVC between October 2021 and April 2023. This analysis was based on electronic medical records. Details of patients, procedures, and instances of catheter misplacement were carefully documented. The immediate complications after UAVC, including pneumothorax, hemothorax, hematoma, arteriovenous fistula, arterial dissection, and skin infection, were recorded. Moreover, late-onset complications such as VTE and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) were also noted. Logistic regression was utilized to determine the independent risk factors for non-optimal catheter tip placement and VTE. Results: A total of 132 UAVC cases were analyzed, with 113 (85.6%) performed by resident physicians and no immediate complications observed. The VTE incidence was 27.3%, particularly higher in elderly patients (≥ 65 years, 43.4%), and fever during TICU stay was noted in 55.3% of cases. Catheter-related infections occurred at a rate of 3.38 per 1,000 catheter days, with eight cases (6.06%) of catheter misplacement. Accurate placement was achieved in 29.8% of 121 patients, predominantly on the right side (40.4%). Factors influencing inaccurate placement included patient age [odds ratios (OR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.10], obesity (OR 9.31, 95% CI 2.58-33.56), and left-side placement (OR 133.04, 95% CI 21.66-817.29), while patient age (>54 years), fever, and ventilation duration (>6.6 days) were associated with VTE development. Conclusion: In severely injured trauma patients, UAVC is associated with a high incidence of VTE and a low rate of optimal catheter tip positioning. Our findings underscore the necessity of standardized protocols to refine catheter tip placement and warrant further investigation through randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.