Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901508›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in elderly surgical patients: a meta-analysis.

Rong Wang, Jinlong Ju, Xiaoyi Pang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rong WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mianyang 404 Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Jinlong JuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Science City Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Xiaoyi PangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mianyang 404 Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided nerve block in geriatric surgical patients, a crucial endeavor for optimizing anesthetic protocols and enhancing perioperative medical outcomes and prognostic indices in this vulnerable patient cohort. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in major bibliographic databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wan Fang, and VIP, to identify studies investigating the utilization of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in elderly surgical patients. The search encompassed publications from database inception to January 2025. Two independent reviewers meticulously screened the retrieved literature, extracted relevant data, and assessed the risk of bias inherent in the included studies. Subsequently, a meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the findings. Results: Twenty-five randomized trials were included in the analysis, The meta-analysis showed that, Compared with the control group, Ultrasound-guided nerve block Blocking effective rate ([RR = 1.21 (1.11, 1.31), Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks constitute an efficacious and safe anesthetic modality for elderly surgical patients. These findings have significant implications for the refinement of anesthetic protocols within the geriatric population, with the potential to enhance perioperative medical quality and patient outcomes. The evidence presented in this meta-analysis provides a robust foundation for the widespread adoption of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in clinical practice for elderly surgical patients.

Indexed as

clinical effectselderlymeta-analysissafetyultrasound-guided nerve blocks

Identifiers

PMID40901508
PMCPMC12399598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.