ReviewOncoTargets and therapy2025
The Role of CELMoD Agents in Multiple Myeloma.
Review in OncoTargets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revolutionizing 2L+ Myeloma: A Podcast on the New Era of BCMA-Targeted Bispecific Antibody Therapies.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- A bibliometric analysis of the research landscape of lenalidomide resistance in multiple myeloma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Targeting Ikaros and Aiolos: Next-Generation Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulators in MM.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Mechanistic Insights and Advances of Bispecific T Cell Engaging Antibodies Therapy in Multiple Myeloma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- T-Cell Redirecting Antibodies for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Off-the-Shelf T-Cell Immunity.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although recent decades have seen continued improvements in survival for patients with multiple myeloma, the disease remains largely incurable, and most patients will experience relapse and/or become refractory to treatment. There thus remains an urgent unmet need for novel treatments, particularly for those patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Novel treatment modalities, such as targeted protein degradation, have attracted particular interest due to their ability to expand the range of druggable protein targets in myeloma cells. Iberdomide (CC-220) and mezigdomide (CC-92480) are promising oral CELMoD™ agents currently being evaluated for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Preclinical data from lenalidomide- and pomalidomide-resistant cell lines and mouse models suggest that iberdomide and mezigdomide have the potential to provide therapeutic benefit even in patients who are refractory to lenalidomide and pomalidomide. The optimized specificity, potency, and safety profile of iberdomide and mezigdomide supports their clinical use and aligns with the need for longer durations of a well-tolerated oral CELMoD agent with synergistic combinability with other immune approaches (such as anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies) and proteasome inhibitors (such as bortezomib and carfilzomib). Although neither iberdomide or mezigdomide has yet received regulatory approval for the treatment of multiple myeloma, based on their mechanism of action and the data available to date, we propose that both drugs may be attractive options for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma; based on their efficacy and safety profiles, iberdomide is likely better suited for use in newly diagnosed, first relapse, or maintenance settings, whereas mezigdomide may also be better suited for use in patients with early relapse or a greater number of prior antimyeloma treatments. Iberdomide and mezigdomide are currently being evaluated for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma in several trials, and results so far are promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.