Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901494›Full record

ReviewOncoTargets and therapy2025

The Role of CELMoD Agents in Multiple Myeloma.

Niels W C J van de Donk, Nizar J Bahlis, Charlotte Pawlyn, Francesca Gay, Maria-Victoria Mateos, Katja Weisel, Sagar Lonial, Paul G Richardson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in OncoTargets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Niels W C J van de DonkDepartment of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7445-2603
Nizar J BahlisArnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Charlotte PawlynThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7190-0028
Francesca GayDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Science, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Maria-Victoria MateosUniversity Hospital of Salamanca/IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2390-1218
Katja WeiselUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sagar LonialWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Paul G RichardsonDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7426-8865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although recent decades have seen continued improvements in survival for patients with multiple myeloma, the disease remains largely incurable, and most patients will experience relapse and/or become refractory to treatment. There thus remains an urgent unmet need for novel treatments, particularly for those patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Novel treatment modalities, such as targeted protein degradation, have attracted particular interest due to their ability to expand the range of druggable protein targets in myeloma cells. Iberdomide (CC-220) and mezigdomide (CC-92480) are promising oral CELMoD™ agents currently being evaluated for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Preclinical data from lenalidomide- and pomalidomide-resistant cell lines and mouse models suggest that iberdomide and mezigdomide have the potential to provide therapeutic benefit even in patients who are refractory to lenalidomide and pomalidomide. The optimized specificity, potency, and safety profile of iberdomide and mezigdomide supports their clinical use and aligns with the need for longer durations of a well-tolerated oral CELMoD agent with synergistic combinability with other immune approaches (such as anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies) and proteasome inhibitors (such as bortezomib and carfilzomib). Although neither iberdomide or mezigdomide has yet received regulatory approval for the treatment of multiple myeloma, based on their mechanism of action and the data available to date, we propose that both drugs may be attractive options for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma; based on their efficacy and safety profiles, iberdomide is likely better suited for use in newly diagnosed, first relapse, or maintenance settings, whereas mezigdomide may also be better suited for use in patients with early relapse or a greater number of prior antimyeloma treatments. Iberdomide and mezigdomide are currently being evaluated for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma in several trials, and results so far are promising.

Indexed as

cerebloniberdomidemezigdomidemultiple myelomatreatment

Identifiers

PMID40901494
PMCPMC12399888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.