ArticleTranslational animal science2025
Risks and uncertainty associated with prices set by equine boarding facility owners.
Article in Translational animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Equine boarding facilities provide critical care for a large portion of the U.S. equine population, yet rising input costs challenge facility owners' ability to maintain services without adjusting fees. Understanding how facility owners perceive boarders' willingness to pay (WTP) for increased boarding costs is essential for balancing equine welfare with business sustainability. This study aimed to 1) assess equine facility owners'/managers' perceptions of how boarders would respond to increased boarding rates, and 2) identify factors influencing those perceptions. A 26-question online survey targeting equine boarding facility owners and managers (n = 112 completed responses) was distributed via Extension channels and social media between July and August 2020. Facility owners reported average monthly board rates and answered a double-bounded dichotomous choice WTP scenario based on a hypothetical increase in care costs. Interval regression analysis was used to estimate perceived WTP, controlling for facility size, boarding type, region, income, and demographic factors. Overall, facility owners perceived that boarders would tolerate a 14.28% (P < 0.01) increase in monthly boarding rates. Full board clients were perceived to have slightly lower WTP (13.42%, P < 0.05); however, due to higher baseline costs, this translated into a greater absolute monthly increase ($69.78) compared to other board types ($34.85). Owners with higher household incomes perceived greater boarder WTP (P < 0.05), while facility size and geographic region were not significant factors. These results suggest that although equine owners may tolerate modest rate increases, larger absolute increases for full board may require additional justification through service value. Understanding owner perceptions of boarder WTP can help boarding facilities make informed pricing decisions that support both business viability and equine welfare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.