ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2025
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for cutaneous melanoma staging: A scientific review.
Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- ESR Essentials: imaging of melanoma-practice recommendations by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging.European radiology · 2026Guideline
- Abbreviated non-contrast magnetic resonance enterography for Crohn's disease: a reliability study.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Ultra-high-frequency ultrasound in the detection of recurrent conjunctival melanoma: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2026Article
- Evolving Paradigms in Gastric Cancer Staging: From Conventional Imaging to Advanced MRI and Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ultra-High-Frequency Ultrasound of Melanoma Excision Scars for Detection of Clinically Occult Local Recurrence: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCutaneous melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer with high metastatic potential. Accurate staging is critical to guide therapeutic strategies and improve prognosis. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI), particularly when combined with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), has emerged as promising tool for comprehensive, radiation-free assessment of metastatic spread.
aimTo systematically review the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of WB-MRI in the staging and restaging of cutaneous melanoma, with comparison to conventional imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT).
methodsA systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases for studies published in the last 10 years. Inclusion criteria focused on comparative diagnostic accuracy studies of WB-MRI
resultsSixteen studies involving over 700 patients met the inclusion criteria. WB-MRI showed high sensitivity (73%-90%) and specificity (up to 98%) in detecting metastases, particularly in bone, liver and soft tissue. DWI enhanced lesion detection, and WB-MRI often influenced clinical management decisions. However, CT outperformed WB-MRI in identifying small pulmonary nodules. AI-assisted analysis and contrast-enhanced sequences further improved diagnostic confidence.
conclusionWB-MRI represents a robust imaging modality for staging cutaneous melanoma, offering superior soft-tissue contrast and functional imaging without ionizing radiation. Its strengths lie in detecting bone, liver and brain metastases. Challenges include limited lung lesion detection, cost, and availability. Advances in artificial intelligence, Hybrid PET/MRY systems, and radiomics are poised to expand WB-MRI's role in personalized melanoma management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.