Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901319›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2025

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for cutaneous melanoma staging: A scientific review.

Anna Russo, Luca Marinelli, Vittorio Patanè, Marina Alessandrella, Maria Cristina Pezzella, Teresa Troiani, Gabriella Brancaccio, Camila Scharf, Giuseppe Argenziano, Salvatore Cappabianca and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anna RussoDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Campania, Italy.
Luca MarinelliDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Campania, Italy.
Vittorio PatanèDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Campania, Italy. vittorio.patane@unicampania.it.
Marina AlessandrellaDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Campania, Italy.
Maria Cristina PezzellaDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Campania, Italy.
Teresa TroianiDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Campania, Italy.
Gabriella BrancaccioDermatology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Campania, Italy.
Camila ScharfDermatology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Campania, Italy.
Giuseppe ArgenzianoDermatology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Campania, Italy.
Salvatore CappabiancaDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Campania, Italy.
Alfonso ReginelliDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Campania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCutaneous melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer with high metastatic potential. Accurate staging is critical to guide therapeutic strategies and improve prognosis. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI), particularly when combined with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), has emerged as promising tool for comprehensive, radiation-free assessment of metastatic spread.

aimTo systematically review the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of WB-MRI in the staging and restaging of cutaneous melanoma, with comparison to conventional imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT).

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases for studies published in the last 10 years. Inclusion criteria focused on comparative diagnostic accuracy studies of WB-MRI

resultsSixteen studies involving over 700 patients met the inclusion criteria. WB-MRI showed high sensitivity (73%-90%) and specificity (up to 98%) in detecting metastases, particularly in bone, liver and soft tissue. DWI enhanced lesion detection, and WB-MRI often influenced clinical management decisions. However, CT outperformed WB-MRI in identifying small pulmonary nodules. AI-assisted analysis and contrast-enhanced sequences further improved diagnostic confidence.

conclusionWB-MRI represents a robust imaging modality for staging cutaneous melanoma, offering superior soft-tissue contrast and functional imaging without ionizing radiation. Its strengths lie in detecting bone, liver and brain metastases. Challenges include limited lung lesion detection, cost, and availability. Advances in artificial intelligence, Hybrid PET/MRY systems, and radiomics are poised to expand WB-MRI's role in personalized melanoma management.

Indexed as

Cutaneous melanomaDiffusion weighted imagingMelanoma stagingOncologic imagingPrecision oncologySoft-tissue metastasesWhole body magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID40901319
PMCPMC12400218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.