ReviewWorld journal of clinical oncology2025
Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer emergencies.
Review in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emergency rectal cancer: clinical presentation and therapeutic options.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality globally, and its management in the emergency setting presents distinct challenges. In addition to its advantages in elective CRC surgery, studies have demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can provide benefits in CRC emergencies, such as reduced morbidity and a shorter length of hospitalization. However, the applicability of MIS in the emergency setting is limited by factors such as compromised patient physiology, resource constraints, and the need for technical expertise. As an alternative to emergency MIS, endoscopic interventions have also been increasingly supported by emerging evidence as a bridge to surgery. This article appraises contemporary guidelines and the evidence behind their recommendations for MIS surgery in CRC emergencies, whilst highlighting the challenges to implementation and the strategies to overcome them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.