ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Editorial: The first 1000 days: window of opportunity for child health and development.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altitude and child development: A cross-sectional comparative study of children in urbanized low-altitude and rural high-altitude settings in Kyrgyzstan.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Minimum acceptable diet and its associated factors among children aged 6-23months in rural households of South Ethiopia.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- A Formative Evaluation of Parental Perceptions Related to Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility, and Reported Use of an e-Learning Resource Targeting Diet in the First 1000 Days: Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Review
- U.S. Immigration Policy Environment Contributions to Maternal and Child Health in the Latino Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Why are policies to combat undernutrition not effective in Mozambique?Nature communications · 2026Article
- The long-term course of perinatal anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.