Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901266›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Modified electroconvulsive therapy for perinatal depression: scoping review.

William V Bobo, Owen Moore, Catherine B Hurley, Robyn Rosasco, Emily E Sharpe, Alyssa M Larish, Katherine M Moore, Hannah K Betcher

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

William V BoboDepartment of Behavioral Sciences & Social Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Owen MooreFlorida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Catherine B HurleyFlorida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Robyn RosascoCharlotte Edwards Maguire Medical Library, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Emily E SharpeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Alyssa M LarishDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Katherine M MooreDepartment of Psychiatry & Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Hannah K BetcherDepartment of Psychiatry & Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Modified electroconvulsive therapy (mECT), the administration of ECT under general anesthesia with muscular relaxation, is indicated for perinatal depression complicated by high severity, psychosis, catatonia, or resistance to conventional therapeutics; however, knowledge gaps remain regarding its effectiveness and safety in depressed patients and its fetal/neonatal risk profile. Materials and methods: We conducted a scoping review of the literature describing the effectiveness and safety (maternal, fetal, and neonatal) of mECT for perinatal depression. Online databases were searched (inception to December 31, 2024) to identify clinical trials, observational studies, case series, and case reports that were topically relevant. Information on key methodological details, clinical characteristics, interventions, and outcomes from each report was extracted by all investigators working in pairs, using an electronic abstraction form. Results: A total of 82 reports (with information on >1,300 pregnancies/deliveries) were included, consisting mainly of case reports (n=57) and case series (n=14), with the remaining citations being non-randomized or retrospective studies. The reviewed reports collectively described a broad spectrum of effectiveness and safety outcomes associated with predominantly acute mECT across multiple forms of perinatal depression, multiple trimesters of pregnancy, and the postpartum. mECT conferred rapid benefit for depressive, psychotic, and catatonic symptoms in severely depressed perinatal patients when effectiveness outcomes were described. The most frequent adverse events were generally mild and transient. However, cases of placental abruption (n=1), premature delivery (n=21), congenital malformations (n=6), and stillbirth (n=4) were also reported across the reviewed reports. Due to limited information, causal links between mECT and many adverse events were difficult to establish and inferences about differential effectiveness and safety between important patient subgroups or variations in mECT technique could not be drawn. Conclusion: mECT appears to be an effective acute phase treatment for severely ill perinatally depressed patients. Although the maternal safety profile of mECT appears reassuring, the available data are far from comprehensive. Moreover, fetal and neonatal safety risks are even less-well-characterized. mECT should be regarded as an important therapeutic option for severe cases of perinatal depression. Informed consent practices should reflect the knowledge gaps highlighted in this review in addition to the well-known side-effects of mECT and the substantial adverse consequences of untreated or undertreated maternal depression. Systematic Review Registration: This project was registered on Open Science Forum, 10.17605/OSF.IO/KB67J.

Indexed as

electroconvulsive therapynon-invasive brain stimulationperinatal depressionperipartum depressionpostpartum depressionprenatal depression

Identifiers

PMID40901266
PMCPMC12400821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.