Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901259›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Adverse childhood experiences and suicidal ideation among nurses in China.

Ying Ling, Xijie Hou, Jie Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ying LingDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Xijie HouDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Jie ZhangSchool of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Suicidal ideation and behaviors constitute a serious public health issue both globally and in China, with nurses having a relatively higher suicide rate. While existing research has established that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may increase the risk of suicide-related behaviors, the precise mechanisms by which ACEs influence suicidal ideation remain underexplored, particularly among nurses. This research investigates the association between ACEs and suicidal ideation, while also analyzing the mediating effect of psychological strain and the moderating influence of impulsivity. Methods: Two top public hospitals, one in Southern China and the other Eastern China, were selected to recruit young nurses for study. The sample consisted of 395 individuals with 80.76% being female and aged between 19 and 42 years. A self-reporting questionnaire survey was administered with a computerized program. Findings: Psychological strain partially mediates the association between ACEs and suicide ideation, with the mediator effect representing 21.70% of the total effect. Impulsivity served as a moderator in the connection between ACEs and suicidal ideation. Conclusion: This study discloses how ACEs can directly and indirectly influence nurses' suicidal ideation through psychological strain, and how impulsivity moderates the connection between ACEs and suicidal ideation. The research findings offer significant practical evidence for enhancing nurses' mental health levels. Future studies could focus on improving nurses' mental health by addressing factors like mitigating the impact of ACEs, reducing psychological strain, and managing impulsivity.

Indexed as

adverse childhood experiencesChinanursesstrainsuicide

Identifiers

PMID40901259
PMCPMC12399515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.