Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901113›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

World Health Organization (WHO)'s vision for a leukemia-free Africa: opportunities and challenges- a narrative review.

Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emmanuel Ifeanyi ObeaguDepartment of Biomedical and Laboratory Science, Africa University, Mutare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4538-0161

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leukemia remains a significant contributor to cancer-related morbidity and mortality across Africa, particularly among children. Limited diagnostic capacity, late-stage presentation, inadequate treatment infrastructure, and financial barriers continue to impede early detection and curative outcomes. In response, the World Health Organization (WHO) has outlined a strategic vision under the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer (GICC), aiming to achieve at least 60% survival for children with the most common cancers, including leukemia, by 2030. This narrative review explores the alignment between WHO's global targets and Africa's regional efforts toward leukemia control. It synthesizes current progress, identifies systemic and contextual challenges, and outlines actionable opportunities for realizing a leukemia-free Africa. Using a narrative review approach, the paper examined peer-reviewed literature, WHO policy documents, regional health strategies, and gray literature published between 2010 and 2024. Despite growing policy attention, leukemia outcomes in many African countries remain far below global targets, with survival rates for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) as low as 20% and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often under 10% in resource-constrained settings. Achieving WHO's 2030 goal of 60% survival for children with leukemia in Africa is possible but will require urgent investment in diagnostic capacity, political commitment to universal health coverage, and integration of leukemia services into national cancer control plans. Strengthening grassroots innovations and region-specific strategies will be critical to bridging the current survival gap and building resilient leukemia care systems across the continent.

Indexed as

Africacancer controlhealthcare systemsleukemiaWHO

Identifiers

PMID40901113
PMCPMC12401219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.