ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Application of Individualized Intensive Biofeedback Electrical Stimulation Therapy in the Recovery of Anal Function After Anal Reconstruction: A Case Report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erratum: Application of Individualized Intensive Biofeedback Electrical Stimulation Therapy in the Recovery of Anal Function After Anal Reconstruction: A Case Report: Erratum.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Importance: For patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer (LARC) unresponsive to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, achieving functional sphincter preservation remains a major challenge due to tumor invasiveness and complex anal reconstruction requirements. Case presentation: A 67-year-old female with LARC underwent extended radical resection involving anal sphincter/puborectalis muscle excision and partial vaginal wall resection. Anal reconstruction was performed via a free left gracilis myocutaneous flap routed in a "γ-shaped" configuration. Postoperatively, an individualized intensive biofeedback electrical stimulation regimen was implemented. After 2 months of training, the patient's anal function had significantly improved, as evidenced by the results of the anorectal manometry (pre-training vs. post-training resting pressure: 24.7 vs. 59.4 mmHg; contraction pressure: 35.1 vs. 434.0 mmHg). As a result, stoma reversal was successfully achieved, and the patient's postoperative anal function is now good (Williams A, Wenxer score 8). Clinical Discussion: Gracilis muscle transplantation provides a viable option for sphincter reconstruction in LARC. Compared with conventional regimens, individualized intensive biofeedback electrical stimulation regimen can not only promote muscle fiber transformation but also significantly improve muscle contraction strength and endurance, addressing the limitations of traditional methods. Conclusion: This case highlights the efficacy of gracilis muscle transplantation for sphincter reconstruction and underscores the critical role of tailored biofeedback electrical stimulation in enhancing gracilis muscle contractility and endurance, and promoting anal function recovery. Our findings suggest that this multimodal approach offers a viable strategy for achieving functional sphincter preservation in low LARC, potentially improving long-term quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.