ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
The selenium paradox friend or foe in breast cancer?
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Selenium-Tellurium Hybrid Nanoparticles: Selectivity, Mechanisms of Redox Modulation, and Therapeutic Prospects in Oncology.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selenium, an essential trace element, has garnered significant attention for its multifaceted role in cancer biology, particularly in breast cancer. As a component of selenoproteins, selenium contributes to antioxidant defense, immune modulation, and apoptosis regulation, making it a promising candidate for cancer prevention and therapy. Epidemiological and experimental studies suggest that selenium supplementation may reduce oxidative stress, enhance immune surveillance, and suppress tumor initiation in breast cancer. These protective effects underscore selenium's potential as an ally in combating breast cancer. However, the role of selenium is far from straightforward, as excessive selenium intake or specific genetic contexts can lead to pro-oxidant effects, promoting DNA damage, inflammation, and tumor progression. Moreover, selenium has been implicated in chemoresistance, potentially hindering the efficacy of standard breast cancer treatments. This dual nature, often referred to as the "selenium paradox," complicates its therapeutic application. The variability in selenium's impact, influenced by genetic polymorphisms, baseline selenium status, and the tumor microenvironment, underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of its role in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.