ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Neonatal microbiome dysbiosis decoded by mNGS: from mechanistic insights to precision interventions.
Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association of fermented dairy consumption with asthma and wheeze risk in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Impact of Polymicrobial Interactions in Human-Metapneumovirus-Infected Children: A Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Based Retrospective Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Targeted next-generation sequencing analysis of pathogens and microecology in pediatric lower respiratory tract infections identifies risk factors for severe community-acquired pneumonia.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Necrotizing enterocolitis in a neonate with severe congenital pulmonary valve stenosis complicated by a postoperative right atrial thrombus: a case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neonatal period is a critical stage for microbial colonization and immune system development, with dynamic changes in the microbiome closely linked to the pathogenesis of various diseases. Traditional microbiological testing methods have low sensitivity and time-consuming limitations compared to metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), which makes it difficult to meet the diagnostic and therapeutic needs of critically ill neonates. mNGS analyzes the total DNA in a sample without bias, allowing comprehensive identification of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites, and resolution of functional genes, providing new avenues for precision diagnosis and treatment of diseases such as neonatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, neonatal pneumonia, neonatal meningitis, neonatal jaundice, and other diseases. However, challenges remain, including the need to optimize sample processing workflows and develop portable devices to enhance clinical conversion potential. In this review, we summarize the application, efficacy, and limitations of mNGS in neonatal diseases. This approach paves the way for novel avenues in mechanistic research, early diagnosis, and personalized therapy for these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.